From: broeker AT acp3bf DOT knirsch DOT de (Hans-Bernhard Broeker)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: DJGPP (gcc) and Borland IDE
Date: 29 Aug 1999 20:58:49 +0200
Organization: RWTH Aachen, III. physikalisches Institut B
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <7qbvt9$1q3@acp3bf.knirsch.de>
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 990829134944 DOT 9438K-100000 AT is>
NNTP-Posting-Host: acp3bf.physik.rwth-aachen.de
X-Trace: nets3.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE 935953136 4256 137.226.32.75 (29 Aug 1999 18:58:56 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT rwth-aachen DOT de
NNTP-Posting-Date: 29 Aug 1999 18:58:56 GMT
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Eli Zaretskii (eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il) wrote:

> On Thu, 26 Aug 1999, =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fran=E7ois?= Jacques wrote:

> > They would have two compiler editions? One
> > embedded in the IDE and one command line?

> Yes, precisely.

Not enough that they have two of them; those two also behave
differently, in some situations. E.g. I have a program that can only
be built with the command line version of Borland C++ 3.1. The
'integrated' compiler bombs on the same program, complaining about an
internal table size being overflown --- And a later version of the
compiler wouldn't compile that same program *at all*, neither the
integrated nor the command-line version...
-- 
Hans-Bernhard Broeker (broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de)
Even if all the snow were burnt, ashes would remain.