From: mhaley99 AT homemail DOT com (Matthew Haley)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: fall of rsxntdj??
Organization: Home
Message-ID: <37bdac75.27293729@news.uswest.net>
References: <37B76E28 DOT 72198225 AT geocities DOT com> <013u3.523$ei1 DOT 1216 AT newsfeeds DOT bigpond DOT com> <7pe6ns$kil$1 AT antares DOT lu DOT erisoft DOT se> <Vh9v3.2505$ei1 DOT 5232 AT newsfeeds DOT bigpond DOT com> <37bd4e15 DOT 3130570 AT news DOT uswest DOT net> <37BD8321 DOT 77097C7 AT NortelNetworks DOT com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.11/32.235
Lines: 22
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 19:37:35 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.181.102.172
X-Trace: news.uswest.net 935177771 209.181.102.172 (Fri, 20 Aug 1999 14:36:11 CDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 14:36:11 CDT
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Hi there,

On Fri, 20 Aug 1999 12:32:34 -0400, "Campbell, Rolf [SKY:1U32:EXCH]"
<cp1v45 AT NortelNetworks DOT com> wrote:

>    OK, I have never used RSXNTDJ, but from what I understand, it an
>extention that allows compiling of code that uses the Win32 api.  It seems
>silly to make a Win32 application that would work in REAL dos, because non of
>the Win32 api would be available (it would be just like DJGPP).

I don't mean that the program the compiler creates should run in DOS,
what I mean is that the compiler it self should run in real dos. That
is the way RSXNTDJ is now, you *don't* have to run it under windows. I
ran version 1.5 under DOS 6.22 and some programs I compiled even ran
under Windows 3.11 with Win32s :)

>
>    On the other hand, where did you get this TSR that allows LFN on real
>dos?

Take a look at http://members.zoom.com/dosuser/ and look for LFNDOS.