Message-Id: <3.0.6.16.19990802202231.0b27cdda@mail.cybercable.fr>
Organization: Michelle's Internet Service
X-Link: http://www.michelle-is.com/index.htm
X-Moto: Micr0$oft = What do you want to crash today?
X-Sender: starone AT mail DOT cybercable DOT fr
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (16)
Date: Mon, 02 Aug 1999 20:22:31 +0100
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
From: Michelle Konzack <starone AT cybercable DOT fr>
Subject: Re: Decompiler Question.
In-Reply-To: <37A53873.71E545D2@earthlink.net>
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 990801120011 DOT 20304b-100000 AT is>
 <37A52432 DOT 60703C94 AT megsinet DOT net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

At 02:19 02.08.1999 -0400, you wrote
--------> This was the original Message:
MK>
MK>
MK>David Oppenheimer wrote:
MK>> 
MK>> I must strenuously disagree here.  First, if disassembly were
impossible, then
MK>> why would programmers waste their time programming disassemlers?! 
MK>
MK>Please note the subject header.  Decompilation is no disassembly.

Hello, there is a DECOMPILER, but you must spend $$$.

It is from Micr0$oft in a Network development package.
I had bought them for WinNT 3.51 at a auction for 2800 US$

The new version will be around 8000 US$

This is, why I try to make programs that can run without 
Micr0$oft operating systems.

Bootsector entry and hopp...

Webmistress Michelle