From: Clemens Valens Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: how about "more" random ? Organization: http://www.remarq.com: The World's Usenet/Discussions Start Here X-Originating-Host: 195.154.148.69 X-Wren-Trace: cBA3FwIQTC0LRUQyAFxRS1tDUERPRAVcRU1fQkBdUBBOTwVfTwVRUE1FTFtICUMEXwodEwJBNDgcDV4dD1UXC1tTHhQ= Message-ID: <933235501.19020@www.remarq.com> References: <7nn5h5$1v1$1 AT trex DOT antw DOT online DOT be> <7nn6iq$hl9$1 AT taliesin DOT netcom DOT net DOT uk> <7np18t$nj5$1 AT trex DOT antw DOT online DOT be> Lines: 10 Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 00:04:58 -0800 NNTP-Posting-Host: 10.0.3.195 X-Complaints-To: wrenabuse AT remarq DOT com X-Trace: WReNphoon3 933235378 10.0.3.195 (Thu, 29 Jul 1999 01:02:58 PDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 01:02:58 PDT To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Random number generation is a science. Take a look at Numerical Recipes, it has a chapter on this (downloadable, algorithms, etc.). You can find it at http://www.nr.com/ Clemens * Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet's Discussion Network * The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free!