Date: Wed, 28 Jul 1999 10:33:15 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Richard Dawe <richdawe AT bigfoot DOT com>
cc: DJGPP newsgroup <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: Re: Bizarre debugging format problem
In-Reply-To: <379CE004.2ED68B91@tudor21.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.990728103255.15288L-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Mon, 26 Jul 1999, Richard Dawe wrote:

> The 2.02 version gives line numbers on running symify:

When you ran symify on v2.02-compiled program, was symify.exe itself
from v2.02 or from v2.01?

v2.02 corrects a subtle bug in libdbg.a functions that read debug info
from the executable (the old version would crash FSDB is some cases),
so it's possible that the new symify is also better in this aspect).

> Hello mum!
> Hello world!
> Exiting due to signal SIGINT
> Control-Break Pressed at eip=0000706e
> eax=00000000 ebx=00000021 ecx=00000000 edx=0000000d esi=00000044
> edi=0004e86c
> ebp=0004e85c esp=0004e850 program=D:\DEVELOP\TEST\dbginfo\testit2
> cs: sel=013f  base=83501000  limit=0005ffff
> ds: sel=0147  base=83501000  limit=0005ffff
> es: sel=010f  base=83501000  limit=0005ffff
> fs: sel=0137  base=000161f0  limit=00003fff
> gs: sel=014f  base=00000000  limit=ffffffff
> ss: sel=0147  base=83501000  limit=0005ffff

This doesn't seem like a v2.02 traceback.  Did I miss something?