Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 09:39:49 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Rolf Campbell <cp1v45 AT nortelnetworks DOT com>
cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Strange localtime function behaviour
In-Reply-To: <379C9D06.E5A1EDF0@americasm01.nt.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.990727093718.5354D-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Mon, 26 Jul 1999, Rolf Campbell wrote:

> > What else would you like to see in the docs of every function?
> 
>     The documentation of each function is fine, but I might like to see
> documentation for keywords like "for", "while", "#include", "#pragma", all of the
> operators (and their precedence)

You are talking about docs for a language, not for a library.  A library 
docs is not supposed to document the language.

> and better iostream/fstream documentation (non
> hierarchical).  And I don't think I've ever seen good documentation of "iomanip.h"
> or some other C++ includes.

The C++ headers and the libraries are not developed by DJGPP, they are 
ported GNU software.  If you have suggestions for improvements in the GNU 
libstdc++ libraries, please submit them to the libstdc++ maintainers.