From: hardwork AT freemail DOT c3 DOT hu Newsgroups: alt.lang.asm,comp.os.msdos.djgpp,comp.lang.asm.x86,alt.os.assembly Subject: An Update regarding OPTASM (was Re: Source of OPTASM) Date: 25 Jul 1999 13:05:04 GMT Organization: The Dragon List Lines: 59 Approved: Message-ID: <7nf220$89i$1@autumn.news.rcn.net> References: <7m645n$f0a$1 AT autumn DOT news DOT rcn DOT net> <7m7igj$1gv$11 AT autumn DOT news DOT rcn DOT net> <7m9aie$1k2$1 AT autumn DOT news DOT rcn DOT net> <7mcua5$re4$1 AT autumn DOT news DOT rcn DOT net> <7mdde6$39r$1 AT autumn DOT news DOT rcn DOT net> X-Trace: LkTayXgYc6SBaf/nbYSXFXSf78P5khTU9HmmAze7wQc= X-Complaints-To: abuse AT rcn DOT com NNTP-Posting-Date: 25 Jul 1999 13:05:04 GMT X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.07 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.0.36 i686) X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 www.proxymate.com:3128 (Squid/2.2.STABLE3), 1.0 x29.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 204.178.22.18, 204.178.22.18 X-Article-Creation-Date: Sun Jul 25 04:10:12 1999 GMT X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDteamwork To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com In article <7mdde6$39r$1 AT autumn DOT news DOT rcn DOT net>, jcoffin AT taeus DOT com (Jerry Coffin) wrote: > > Anyone know who owns the sources of the OPTASM compiler? > Symantec, AFAIK. They were interested in OptLink, but unless I'm > mistaken, bought the entire company. > > It would be nice if the source-code of OPTASM can be made > > GPLed. That way, a lot of niceties of OPTASM can be ported to > > NASM or other open-sourced assembly compilers. > I doubt it'll happen, but you're certain welcome to try... After I read the above message from Jerry, I went to http://www.symantec.com and posted a message in their "Customer Service/Technical Support Forum" requesting the Symantec corp to release the sourcecode for OPTASM into the public domain (I did not specifically mentioned GPL, I used the term "public domain" instead). . . Several days later I checked back, and I saw several other people replied to my message asking essentially the same thing --- requesting that the Symantec Corp to release the sourcecode of OPTASM to the public domain, since they (the Symantec Corp.) isn't selling the OPTASM compiler anymore. Well... several days _after_ that, the Symantec Corp CLOSED DOWN THE ENTIRE customer service/technical support forum !!! Yeah... talk about a GREAT RESPOND from Symantec. I mean, if they refuse to reply (or even acknowledge) my request, I can understand it. But their reaction in closing down the ENTIRE PUBLIC FORUM is really, IMHO, truly an OVERKILL !!! Oh well... unless there is a concerted effort to gather grassroot support from the Net community in asking giants like Symantec to do something, I don't think we can get anywhere. The problem now is, how to gather grassroot support? Anyone familiar with organizing such a thing? Anyone wants to volunteer organizing such a thing? I'd be all ears. Thanks in advance. Sincerely, Bob hardwork AT freemail DOT c3 DOT hu Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/ Share what you know. Learn what you don't.