From: Mark Phillips Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp,comp.lang.c++ Subject: Re: Casting a class as a function pointer. Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 14:18:58 -0500 Organization: The University of Manitoba Lines: 9 Message-ID: References: <378A2FFE DOT D9A4F8A0 AT americasm01 DOT nt DOT com> <378AB489 DOT 75F19B1E AT unb DOT ca> <378B7784 DOT E718C436 AT americasm01 DOT nt DOT com> NNTP-Posting-Host: silver.cs.umanitoba.ca Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: canopus.cc.umanitoba.ca 931893542 21866 130.179.24.6 (13 Jul 1999 19:19:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: Postmaster AT cc DOT umanitoba DOT ca NNTP-Posting-Date: 13 Jul 1999 19:19:02 GMT In-Reply-To: To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > construct that you know is legal and portable. And besides, you're > discouraging them from using operator functions, and that's very good. What's wrong with operator functions? Not that I disbelieve you, it's just that I'm very unenlightened... Mark