From: clee2 AT envirolink DOT org (Chris Lee)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Hello World and File size
Date: 11 Jul 1999 15:47:42 GMT
Organization: Your Organization
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <7maeau$j64$1@autumn.news.rcn.net>
References: <01bec8b3$69886440$LocalHost AT thendren> <3784c5e6 DOT 26155088 AT 207 DOT 69 DOT 128 DOT 130> <7m3h35$s4p$1 AT nnrp1 DOT deja DOT com> <3785C141 DOT 38F7CAA5 AT silesia DOT top DOT pl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Trace: 9KcHti4OTl9mFoUItD3N/WiTMhyPePXpWiCn7qFsXLI=
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT rcn DOT com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 11 Jul 1999 15:47:42 GMT
X-No-Archive:  Yes
X-Newsreader:  WinVN 0.99.10 (beta 1) [de] (16bit)
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

In article <3785C141 DOT 38F7CAA5 AT silesia DOT top DOT pl>, wapex AT silesia DOT top DOT pl says...
>
>
>
>chongkong AT my-deja DOT com wrote:
>> 
>> is the object code by djgpp has a minimal size of 100k?
>> 
>link with -s option
>> and if you use packer would the program run at the same speed?
>you mean use djp to compress the exe, yes the same speed

DJP is obsolete, use UPX to compress the exe instead....