From: hardwork AT freemail DOT c3 DOT hu
Newsgroups: alt.lang.asm,comp.os.msdos.djgpp,comp.lang.asm.x86,alt.os.assembly
Subject: Re: Benchmarking of NASM
Date: 10 Jul 1999 13:40:30 GMT
Organization: The Dragon List
Lines: 29
Approved: <johnfine AT erols DOT com>
Message-ID: <7m7ige$1gv$6@autumn.news.rcn.net>
References: <7m645n$f0a$1 AT autumn DOT news DOT rcn DOT net> <7m6ck4$iu0$1 AT autumn DOT news DOT rcn DOT net> <7m6g4k$hvv$2 AT autumn DOT news DOT rcn DOT net>
X-Trace: 41EMUBSEbjzh8DAaYaem5I8iosfx8KmnHHoXj1gD9ls=
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT rcn DOT com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 10 Jul 1999 13:40:30 GMT
X-Authentication-Warning:  backdraft.briar.org: smap set sender to <news AT dejanews DOT com> using -f
X-Http-User-Agent:  Mozilla/4.07 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.0.36 i686)
X-Http-Proxy:  1.0 www.proxymate.com:8000 (Apache/1.3.6), 1.0 x24.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 204.178.22.18
X-Article-Creation-Date:  Sat Jul 10 08:12:22 1999 GMT
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

In article <7m6g4k$hvv$2 AT autumn DOT news DOT rcn DOT net>,  entropy AT ihug DOT com DOT au wrote:


> >Surely you are not asking this about assemblers???

> i think he means, how long does it take to compile N lines
> etc

> -df



Sorry for not being clear the first time around.

What I meant when I said "benchmark" was about (yes) the compiling speed, the
effeciency of the compiler (optimization and such), a feature by feature
compare between NASM, A86 (A386), MASM, TASM and OPTASM.

What I asked was if there is a "suite" or something that we can run (compile)
and compare the various differences between the assemblers I mentioned above.

Is there any such thing (or things)?

Thank you for your time.


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.