From: hardwork AT freemail DOT c3 DOT hu
Newsgroups: alt.lang.asm,comp.os.msdos.djgpp,comp.lang.asm.x86,alt.os.assembly
Subject: Benchmarking of NASM
Date: 10 Jul 1999 00:29:43 GMT
Organization: The Dragon List
Lines: 10
Approved: <johnfine AT erols DOT com>
Message-ID: <7m645n$f0a$1@autumn.news.rcn.net>
X-Trace: jYepNDcrmLOQjQTaClcGEjjvTi0Nfz4TgpFaE/3d5Kg=
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT rcn DOT com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 10 Jul 1999 00:29:43 GMT
X-Http-User-Agent:  Mozilla/4.07 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.0.36 i686)
X-Mozilla-Status:  0801
X-Http-Proxy:  1.0 www.proxymate.com:8000 (Apache/1.3.6), 1.0 x24.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 204.178.22.18
X-Article-Creation-Date:  Fri Jul 09 23:59:44 1999 GMT
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Please forgive me if this has been mentioned before.

Is there any benchmark we can run to compare the performance of NASM with
other x86 assemblers like A86, MASM, TASM and OPTASM?

Thank you for your time.


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.