Sender: nate AT cartsys DOT com
Message-ID: <37857E98.626955B5@cartsys.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 1999 21:46:16 -0700
From: Nate Eldredge <nate AT cartsys DOT com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.08 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.10 i586)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Why won't Allegro 3.11 and GRX compile under Windows 98 ?
References: <29772E4C85A6329A DOT A92118469FFBDE9A DOT BE07E58B325A3DF2 AT lp DOT airnews DOT net> <3783E907 DOT 7FBD177E AT cartsys DOT com> <F359E8B59839CCC1 DOT 111B336120B3D774 DOT DE0794414F65B1DB AT lp DOT airnews DOT net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

jdm wrote:
> 
> Nate Eldredge wrote in message <3783E907 DOT 7FBD177E AT cartsys DOT com>...
> >jdm wrote:
> >>
> >> I have DJGPP set up on both my computer at work and at home.  My
> work
> >> computer runs Windows 95, and I compiled Allegro and GRX with no
> >> problems on it.  But when I try to compile them at home, they both
> >> tell me I can't compile them under this operating system.  Is there
> a
> >> define I can change or an environment variable I can set to get
> them
> >> to compile?
> >
> >The message, obviously, is bogus.  It probably means that whatever
> >mechanism is used to detect DJGPP hasn't found it, usually because of
> a
> >messed-up installation.  Have you installed everything you need, and
> set
> >the DJGPP environment variable?
> >--
> 
> No, it's not bogus.

I meant that in the sense of: it is bogus to say that it can't be
compiled under Windows 98.  The message does not really mean what it
says; it has been issued erroneously; it is bogus.

Oh well.    
-- 

Nate Eldredge
nate AT cartsys DOT com