From: "Bart Alewijnse" Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: X and GNOME ports. Date: 18 Jun 1999 13:29:13 GMT Organization: WorldOnline News server Lines: 38 Message-ID: <01beb98f$0cfb24c0$LocalHost@scarfboy.tip.nl> References: <5Tqa3.12207$PN5 DOT 32277 AT newsfeeds DOT bigpond DOT com> NNTP-Posting-Host: vp178-204.worldonline.nl X-Trace: news.worldonline.nl 929712553 23909 195.241.178.204 (18 Jun 1999 13:29:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse AT worldonline DOT nl NNTP-Posting-Date: 18 Jun 1999 13:29:13 GMT X-Newsreader: Microsoft Internet News 4.70.1155 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com There is a (perhaps a few) windows X server. (in the regular world, it's called a client but as X users know, X names it the other way around) If you're dying to do stuff like this, uh... Convince linux users to start using windows again in the first place.. A :lot: just switched to linux and kept w95 for some progs that aren't (and won't be) ported to linux... But as to total desktop facelift, I don't know. Apart from the fact I know there's a windows X client around. Which is useless unless yo run linux on a second machine. (not a bad idea, but often an out-of-budget idea.) -Bart Johan Venter wrote in article <5Tqa3.12207$PN5 DOT 32277 AT newsfeeds DOT bigpond DOT com>... > Is anyone planning to port X and GNOME to DOS? > > The reason I ask is because I love Linux, and want to have my Windows box looking like > Linux. The ultimate would be to have GNOME and Enlightenment running on Bash. I have Bash, > so I'm half way there. > > To me, this seems like the most logical step up for DJGPP and Unix->DOS ports in general. > > What would be involved to port GNOME and X to DOS? I realise it would be a lot of work, > but no more than already has been done on DOS ports of the GNU tools. > > -- > Johan Venter > ICQ 3643877 > Visit The TPU DJGPP Interest Group: > http://surf.to/djgppig