Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 13:56:29 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: salvador <salvador AT inti DOT gov DOT ar>
cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com, allegro AT canvaslink DOT com, balug-lst AT balug DOT org DOT ar
Subject: Re: Compilers comparisson, some opinions about the generated , assembler
In-Reply-To: <199906151650.MAA23053@delorie.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.990616135402.27724D-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Tue, 15 Jun 1999, salvador wrote:

>   Me again with the gcc/egcs/pgcc/MSVC/Watcom comparisson.

Won't the fact that the benchmarks were all run from Windows 95 affect 
the comparison (due to Windows' overhead which doesn't have to be the
same for PM DOS program and Win32 program)?