Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 11:13:18 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Dlanor Blytkerchan <dlanor AT dds DOT nl>
cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: malloc() problem (resumed)
In-Reply-To: <l03130300b3848b7ad037@[145.98.116.77]>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.990610111255.17697Q-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Wed, 9 Jun 1999, Dlanor Blytkerchan wrote:

> The weird thing is, though it does the same thing, it does not produce the
> error. The only diffirence is the VGAP library being linked in. Removing it
> (the library) from the program itself does not remove the error, even
> though it does exactly the same as the source above (and I do mean exactly
> the same).

Are you saying that two identical source files behave differently when
compiled?  Unless you used different compilation and link switches,
this should never happen.

If the sources are not identical, but just ``similar'', then the cause
of your problem hides somewhere in the differences, however small and
insignificant they might look.