Message-ID: <37533712.2CB224D2@hitech.net.au> From: leroy X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en,ja MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: putpixel method References: <12907576 DOT 928170590243 DOT JavaMail DOT w-epost AT localhost> <375331E2 DOT 65A7180A AT cartsys DOT com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 19 Date: Tue, 01 Jun 1999 11:27:46 +1000 NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.27.197.43 X-Complaints-To: abuse AT telstra DOT net X-Trace: nswpull.telstra.net 928200825 203.27.197.43 (Tue, 01 Jun 1999 11:33:45 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 01 Jun 1999 11:33:45 EST Organization: Customer of Telstra Big Pond Direct To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Nate Eldredge wrote: > Writing to video memory is not risky per se; the risk comes if you miss > and write to some other kind of memory :) In the above example, it > might be wise (while debugging) to check that y < 200 and x < 320, and > that you have the right number of zeros in 0xA0000. > -- Isn't it 0xA000, only 3 zero's. Thats the address I always write to and it works. The irony of it is pretty funny though. Cheers, leroy.