From: George Lugovoy <glugovoy AT uic DOT rnd DOT runnet DOT ru>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: DJGPP V2.02 vs. 2.01 ????
Date: Fri, 14 May 1999 11:35:37 +0000
Organization: University Internet Class
Lines: 11
Message-ID: <373C0A89.41C67EA6@uic.rnd.runnet.ru>
References: <sYUZ2.20438$ny DOT 1295016 AT typhoon-sf DOT snfc21 DOT pbi DOT net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: kant.uic.rnd.runnet.ru
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: oberon.rnd.runnet.ru 926681734 12777 195.208.252.55 (14 May 1999 11:35:34 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet AT oberon DOT rnd DOT runnet DOT ru
NNTP-Posting-Date: 14 May 1999 11:35:34 GMT
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04Gold (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.0-CURRENT i386)
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Dave Bloodgood wrote:
> 
> I have been using 2.01 for quite a while --- now I notice ( Ive not been
> reading this group ) that there is
> a v2.02. Is there a brief summary of the changes / improvements - is it
> worth my while to get the new
> version ?

Try to read .inf file

- George