Date: Sun, 28 Mar 1999 10:42:48 -0500
Message-Id: <199903281542.KAA00365@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <Pine.SUN.3.91.990328161819.22925v-100000@is> (message from Eli
	Zaretskii on Sun, 28 Mar 1999 16:22:24 +0200 (IST))
Subject: Re: DJGPP: the future is... ?
References:  <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 990328161819 DOT 22925v-100000 AT is>
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> These are all okay, but I have a much more prosaic wish: would
> somebody please work on adding the missing functions from the 2 ISO
> Appendices to the C89 standard, and also the ones planned for the
> upcoming C9x standard?

Is there an official source for what these standards are?