Date: Sun, 28 Mar 1999 14:37:35 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv>
cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: DJGPP support in standard EGCS 1.1.2
In-Reply-To: <Pine.A41.4.05.9903221002340.32280-100000@ieva01.lanet.lv>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.990328143707.22925R-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Mon, 22 Mar 1999, Andris Pavenis wrote:

>   - gcc/cp/g++spec.c to use libstdcxx.a instead of libstdc++.a would be nice 
>     as then we can use the same library file name as for native compiling
>     with DJGPP.

Why do file names like g++spec.c exist in the distribution?  They
alone would prevent EGCS from building without LFN support.

Can't you ask the maintainers to rename the files?  I had no problems
like that with any GNU maintainer, including RMS.