From: Stuart Moore Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp,rec.arts.int-fiction Subject: Re: The Frotz interpreter - ASM problems! Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 14:51:05 +0000 Organization: University College Worcester Lines: 27 Message-ID: <36E3E3D9.321E@my-dejanews.com> References: <36DD8703 DOT 248D AT my-dejanews DOT com> <36E035B9 DOT 396187EF AT alcyone DOT com> <36E17E84 DOT 20C AT my-dejanews DOT com> <36E198F2 DOT 9B284B66 AT alcyone DOT com> <7c0l9s$fe7 AT joker DOT rz DOT hu-berlin DOT de> NNTP-Posting-Host: 194.83.249.98 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: nellg.worc.ac.uk 920904810 13636 194.83.249.98 (8 Mar 1999 14:53:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet AT nellg DOT worc DOT ac DOT uk NNTP-Posting-Date: 8 Mar 1999 14:53:30 GMT X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.04 (Win16; I) To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Andrew Plotkin wrote: > > Paul David Doherty (h0142kdd AT joker DOT rz DOT hu-berlin DOT de) wrote: > > Okay, so Stuart didn't understand the assembly bits in Frotz, and Erik > > didn't even look at them, but still the two of you agree that it's > > bizarre, stupid and lame. Did I get that right? It's bizzare, stupid and lame because it's *pointless*, Paul. > I haven't looked at it either, but I agree it's lame too. Yay! > Whaddaya want, chocolate ice cream? Mint? > (Note: Part of the reason I say assembly is lame is that it's obviously > not necessary -- it's not *in* the main Frotz distribution. I assume we're > talking about the djgpp port here.) It is in the DOS source code, Andrew. Bye, -- Stuart Moore.