Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.19990303125211.0093f100@pop.globalserve.net> X-Sender: derbyshire AT pop DOT globalserve DOT net (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32) Date: Wed, 03 Mar 1999 12:52:11 -0500 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com From: Paul Derbyshire Subject: Re: silly question (I read the FAQ first). In-Reply-To: <36DAC9CB.256EF281@nortelnetworks.com> References: <3 DOT 0 DOT 6 DOT 32 DOT 19990225020746 DOT 00901390 AT pop DOT globalserve DOT net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com At 12:09 PM 3/1/99 -0500, you wrote: >Paul, > mode switch on a monitor may or may not shorten the monitor life >depending on the type of horizontal oscillator. The cheaper mono type >when I was into that use a series of one shots to generate front porch, >scan period and back porch. Thus if you blasted them with the wrong >horizontal frequency the resonant coil would be off frequency and smoke. > > Not sure but the multi sync stuff have no one shots and a much broader >resonant coil. I think they phase lock onto what they receive as >Horizontal drive. By multi sync I mean monitors that are dual purpose >vga/svga etc. Hm. Any way to tell which mine is? Also, is this stuff for real? Or have you been watching too much Star Trek? :-) (Phase lock, resonant coil... or maybe Star Trek borrows their techno-words from the video screen technology jargon?) -- .*. "Clouds are not spheres, mountains are not cones, coastlines are not -() < circles, and bark is not smooth, nor does lightning travel in a `*' straight line." ------------------------------------------------- -- B. Mandelbrot |http://surf.to/pgd.net _____________________ ____|________ Paul Derbyshire pderbysh AT usa DOT net Programmer & Humanist|ICQ: 10423848|