From: Ludvig Larsson <ludvig AT club-internet DOT fr>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: [Semi-OT] Making a transaction.
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 1999 02:07:08 +0100
Organization: Faas-Goldhart
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <36D1FF3C.1D60@club-internet.fr>
References: <3 DOT 0 DOT 6 DOT 32 DOT 19990212180944 DOT 0089a1a0 AT pop DOT netaddress DOT com> <36D0BFD4 DOT 7235 AT club-internet DOT fr>
NNTP-Posting-Host: toulouse-4-58.club-internet.fr
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: front6.grolier.fr 919731825 16290 194.158.125.58 (23 Feb 1999 01:03:45 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: 23 Feb 1999 01:03:45 GMT
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01C-CLUB  (Win95; I)
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

I thought about it, and maybe
you should opt for a master-slave
system instead:
a) is mastar and decides if things have been
done correct.
b) does what it's been told, and replies.

If a) won't get any answers, it has to relance
a question about what went wrong and decide to
redo or abort.

If both a) and b) can decide weither things
have been going ok, I think a lot op questions/answers
has to be sended, and maybe a) and b) might decide
different things anyway if there are problems
with the last transfer.

Ludvig Larsson