Message-ID: Date: Tue, 16 Feb 1999 19:50:48 +0000 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com From: Dave Bird Subject: Re: DJGPPFAQ.HTML, usability problems. References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Turnpike (32) Version 4.01 Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com In article , Eli Zaretskii writes You do an absolutely brilliant FAQ, and I'm not trying to make your life harder. > >On Mon, 15 Feb 1999, Dave Bird wrote: > >> By the time I hit "if you are in a hurry" (I was) I hit a >> very buggy bit. > >Thanks for your comments. I will save them and try to correct them >when I release the next version of the FAQ. However, I'm afraid that >I cannot do much about most of what you write, since I cannot work >around every bug in every browser out there. I test the FAQ with >several versions of several browsers available to me, but I cannot >test them all, and I cannot track the bugs the new releases introduce >every month in their constant race to put out newer and buggier >versions. Entirely appreciated. Your HTML is a great deal more standard than my web-page, which is on a one-browser-and-hope basis. > >> The link to "Table of Contents" is actually to "Top" -- way >> above the table of contents. > >I use Texinfo to generate the FAQ in all formats. Until now, Texinfo >didn't support links to something that isn't a node, and most Web >browsers aren't smart enough to find the string that is part of the >link text, like Info does, and instead land you at the beginning of >the node, which is useless in many cases. > >The next version of Texinfo will support links to anchors that I can >put anywhere, so I will be able to handle this issue more >intelligently. OK. > >> Additionally, the HTML source >> uses enormously wide lines which is OK if it 100% works and >> users never need to view source, but.... > >..but what? Why is the appearence of the HTML source important? The >FAQ source explicitly says at the beginning NOT to look at it, as it >is ugly. If a link fails to link, the lusers are likely to view the source to find out what's happening (whether or not they're supposed to). > >The are good technical reason for this ugliness which I won't go >into. If you are intersted, download the FAQ sources (faq211s.zip) >and look at the process the HTML output is generated. > >> The links to "Program Index" and "Topic Index" are funny. >> They don't work in Netscape4; I don't think it likes spaces >> in names. > >Netscape 3 doesn't have any problems with the indices. I suggest to >downgrade. This is going to be fun as I have to shut down and enter an alternative boot partition. OK. My main partition has a copy of Netscape Navigator 4.04, won't link on those two names. Djgpp partition has netscape 3, it links on them. I don't know why netscape have decided to make your life harder by changing the rules for version 4; I'll use version 3. > >(The problems with spaces in link names is very hard to solve with >present tools; the next version of Texinfo will solve this for me.) > >> In Internet Exploder they work but Back doesn't >> work with local names, it goes "back" to the top of the file; > >I cannot reproduce this problem in IE. What version did you use? It seems to be version 3.0 and I can't understand why it's a very old version; I think perhaps it came with the newsreader installation CD. Hmm. You're going to tell me this is fixed later, aren't you? I'll just go back to sleep :-(. Sorry to have troubled you. The problem that the new version of Netscape has lumbered you with re spaces in names is genuine enough; although I appreciate what you say above about the technical difficulty of dealing with *their* incompatibilities between versions. -- ^-^-^-@@-^-;-^ http://www.xemu.demon.co.uk/ (..)__u news:alt.smoking.mooses happy as a clam at high tide -. <_" .-._.-.