Date: Fri, 12 Feb 1999 16:56:21 -0500
Message-Id: <199902122156.QAA21804@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <3.0.6.32.19990212164718.0081b960@pop.netaddress.com> (message
	from Paul Derbyshire on Fri, 12 Feb 1999 16:47:18 -0500)
Subject: Re: Re-entrancy questions.
References:  <3 DOT 0 DOT 6 DOT 32 DOT 19990212164718 DOT 0081b960 AT pop DOT netaddress DOT com>
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com


> Is the DJGPP 'new' thread-safe already, or should someone developing
> a threading library for DJGPP wrap 'new' to be thread-safe?

I don't think anyone has put any efforts into making djgpp's libraries
re-entrant or thread safe, so I suppose the answer is no unless
someone does the research to prove otherwise or make it so.