Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 13:42:52 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv>
cc: Artur Zaroda <zaroda AT ghost DOT mimuw DOT edu DOT pl>, djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: cxxfilt.exe in bnu281b.zip and gxx.exe in djdev202.zip
In-Reply-To: <Pine.A41.4.05.9901281326280.53610-100000@ieva01.lanet.lv>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.990128134109.16407E-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com


On Thu, 28 Jan 1999, Andris Pavenis wrote:

> > Isn't it better to remove -lgpp at all?  I don't think g++ on Unix does 
> > that anymore, does it?
> 
> Of course. If we are removing -lgpp from gxx.exe then I
> think there is no more any need for it except than linking libm.a.

What about -lstdcxx?  That one still needs to be mentioned.

As for -lm, I always thought that some classes in libstdcxx.a require 
libm.a.  Isn't that correct anymore?