From: Dave Bird <dave AT xemu DOT demon DOT co DOT uk>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: DOS Box clear-up
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1999 21:28:54 +0000
Organization: very little
Message-ID: <HunzeQCWC5q2Ewj7@xemu.demon.co.uk>
References: <3 DOT 0 DOT 1 DOT 16 DOT 19990124113513 DOT 26af1cee AT shadow DOT net>
 <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 990124192330 DOT 9257B-100000 AT is>
NNTP-Posting-Host: xemu.demon.co.uk
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: xemu.demon.co.uk:158.152.196.209
X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 917230835 nnrp-09:24231 NO-IDENT xemu.demon.co.uk:158.152.196.209
X-Complaints-To: abuse AT demon DOT net
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Newsreader: Turnpike (32) Version 4.01  <dQumtnY$x4rJ2u5tL5fS$n2vuP>
Lines: 20
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

In article <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 990124192330 DOT 9257B-100000 AT is>, Eli Zaretskii
<eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> writes
>On Sun, 24 Jan 1999, Ralph Proctor wrote:
>
>> Now, would you state if it is true that it is possible to run in DOS on a 
>> Windows 95 and above machine WITH NO INTERFERENCE OR
>> INVOLVEMENT FROM Windows?
>
>I'm not really sure what you are asking about.

I think he means:  if he "RESETS THE MACHINE INTO DOS MODE",
can he be assured that Win95 is utterly gone, 
until put back by actually re-booting.



-- 
   ^-^-^-@@-^-;-^   http://www.xemu.demon.co.uk/
        (..)__u     news:alt.smoking.mooses