From: "Seyil Yoon" <wings AT interlog DOT com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Exceptions in v2.02
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 1999 16:00:26 -0500
Organization: Data Recovery Labs
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <77oajn$if1$1@nntp3.uunet.ca>
References: <77nrlj$cop$1 AT nntp3 DOT uunet DOT ca> <7832 DOT 990115 AT bspu DOT unibel DOT by>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.47.85.27
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3155.0
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Alexander Bokovoy wrote in message <7832 DOT 990115 AT bspu DOT unibel DOT by>...
>> catch(CException Exception)
>try this variant of statement (it compiles and works for me without any
warnings):
>catch(CException& Exception)


Hmm ... thank you for the help.

I would still like to know if there is anything syntactically
incorrect with the statement

catch(CException Exception)

It seems to be the way the statement is used in many books
(including the Stroustrup book), so I would assume that, at
the very least, it is correct (questions of style and what
not being disregarded).