From: Martin Ambuhl <mambuhl AT earthlink DOT net>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Including Or Not??
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 05:29:22 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <Pine DOT BSI DOT 3 DOT 96 DOT 990113093654 DOT 840A-100000 AT amos-08 DOT cs DOT huji DOT ac DOT il>
X-Posted-Path-Was: not-for-mail
X-Accept-Language: en
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-ELN-Date: 13 Jan 1999 10:29:32 GMT
X-ELN-Insert-Date: Wed Jan 13 02:35:07 1999
Organization: Nocturnal Aviation
Lines: 45
Mime-Version: 1.0
NNTP-Posting-Host: 1cust7.tnt12.nyc3.da.uu.net
Message-ID: <369C7582.C845C0C1@earthlink.net>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win95; I)
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

oferco wrote:
> 
> Hello:
> 
> consider this:
> 
> typedef struct {
> 
>     enum { foo } goo;
> 
> } boo;
> 
> typedef struct loo {
> 
>     boo moo;
> 
> } roo;
> 
> int main() {
> 
>   roo* noo;
> 
>   noo->moo.goo = foo;
> 
> };
> 
> it compiles ok when all of the above is in the same file.
> BUT
> if I have:
> test.h - the typedefs
> thst.c - main and #include "test.h"
> 
> the compiler yells - 'foo' undeclared (first use this function)


When I place the typedefs in a separate file, I get no errors other than
the expected one for the illegal ';' after the closing brace and the
warning for the lack of a return value.  It seems you have done
something else wrong.



-- 
Martin Ambuhl (mambuhl AT earthlink DOT net)
Note: mambuhl AT tiac DOT net will soon be inactive