Message-Id: <3.0.1.16.19990104083208.124729b6@shadow.net>
X-Sender: ralphgpr AT shadow DOT net
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.1 (16)
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1999 08:32:08
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
From: Ralph Proctor <ralphgpr AT shadow DOT net>
Subject: Re: djgpp and windows2000
Cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-Reply-To: <199901031437.JAA05213@delorie.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

At 09:37 AM 1/3/99 -0500, you wrote:
>What is MS's exact meaning about that W2K will not support dos?
>
>(a)  needn't  dos  , run dos program as well as win9x .
>(b)  can't boot from dos , run dos program well .
>(c)  run dos program like in NT console .
>(d)  can't use anything about dos .
>
>What can we do to let MS know that it's a wrong way
>if the answer is (d)?

PMFJI, but on this thread, isn't the latest and ONLY DOS
(not counting OpenDOS) the one from IBM? PC DOS 7?
I thought IBM had taken over this distribution.

In other words, what has Micro$oft got to do with it now?