Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1998 23:23:45 -0500
Message-Id: <199812200423.XAA26278@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
CC: sl AT psycode DOT com
In-reply-to: <fycflpbqrpbz.f48xha0.pminews@nntp.generation.net>
	(sl AT psycode DOT com DOT REMOVE_THIS)
Subject: Re: I'm happy with DJGPP v2.02
References: <36794EFE DOT DF9 AT teleline DOT es> <fycflpbqrpbz DOT f48xha0 DOT pminews AT nntp DOT generation DOT net>
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com


> On Thu, 17 Dec 1998 19:35:42 +0100, Mariano Alvarez Fernández wrote:
> 
> >DJ wrote:
> >
> >> > >At last (using DJGPP v2.02) the 32 bit version of my data-base app
> >> > >run as fast as the 16 bit version, and now I can use a lot of 
> >> > >memory.
> >
> >>I think that means that the *speed* of 2.02 is a lot faster than 2.01,
> >>which certainly is true for stdio file I/O.
> >
> >Yes, it means that. And the 16 bit version was compiled with BC.
> 
> 	I'm confused.. If all DJGPP stuff is 32-bit, what 16-bit version are
> you talking about?!

The comparison was between a 32-bit version built with DJGPP and a
16-bit version built with Borland C, from a set of common sources.