Sender: nate AT cartsys DOT com
Message-ID: <3665D341.24DC59C@cartsys.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 1998 15:54:41 -0800
From: Nate Eldredge <nate AT cartsys DOT com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.0.35 i486)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Djgpp 3.0?
References: <008401be1d1c$4373b9a0$abea43ca AT dt2>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Don Tennant II wrote:
> 
> thanks for the clarification.  i'm running 2.01 (checked the readme.1st) --
> time to upgrade!  :-)

Probably not, actually; you should keep using 2.01 for "production"
purposes.  Feel free to use 2.02, but it's probably best that anything
you distribute should be built with the 2.01 headers and library.  2.02,
being beta, may still have unpleasant bugs (though at present it seems
from reports to be rather stable).
-- 

Nate Eldredge
nate AT cartsys DOT com