Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp From: "Mike Ruskai" Message-ID: References: <363532BA DOT 6FA0626F AT erols DOT com> <7144gm$i1n$1 AT star DOT cs DOT vu DOT nl> <873e87lc4a DOT fsf AT hasn DOT dera DOT gov DOT uk> X-Newsreader: PMINews 2.00.1201 For OS/2 Organization: TLF MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: C++ with DJGPP Lines: 32 Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 19:59:55 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.3.130.120 NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 11:59:55 PDT To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com On 29 Oct 1998 13:40:52 +0000, Rude Boy Ian Miller wrote: >"Rude Mike Ruskai" writes: > >> On 27 Oct 1998 09:41:42 GMT, Boon van der RJ wrote: >> >> >Mike Ruskai wrote: >> >> A pretty stupid way to pack up the archive, if you ask me. It should be >> >> short names, period, with scripts to rename files and patch sources to use >> >> long names. >> > >> >I don't think it should be like that. If you just use DOS an >> >LFN-packed archive is OK. If you just use WIN95 an LFN-archive is even >> >better. If you use both DOS and Win95 you should follow the FAQ... >> >> You seem to be missing the point. The script would rename the files and >> correct the filenames in all #include's from the header files. >> >> Relying on the behavior of a dearchiver program is the Wrong Thing to do. > >Cobblers! "You seem to be missing the point" that renaming the LFNs to >SFNs and having a script to rename them back again is completely unnecessary >(provided that you RTFM). Period. Horse puckey. The limits of your imagination do not stretch to reality. -- - Mike Remove 'spambegone' to send e-mail.