Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 15:20:39 +0100 (MET)
From: Olivier Perron <perron AT art DOT alcatel DOT fr>
X-Sender: perron AT rtbsci146tu
To: Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv>
Cc: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: DJGPP 2.02 Beta 981027
In-Reply-To: <199810291403.QAA34286@ieva06.lanet.lv>
Message-Id: <Pine.GSO.4.05.9810291511230.2678-100000@rtbsci146tu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, 29 Oct 1998, Andris Pavenis wrote:

> Date sent:      	Thu, 29 Oct 1998 14:47:07 +0100 (MET)
> From:           	Olivier Perron <perron AT art DOT alcatel DOT fr>
> Subject:        	Re: DJGPP 2.02 Beta 981027
> 
> > > 
> > OK, but now what about the files which are provided by gcc-2.8.1 in
> > %DJDIR/lib/gcc-lib/djgpp/2.81 ?
> > Should I leave them untouched, should I remove them since the ones that
> > come with DJGPP-2.02 are correct ?
> > Does have gcc a directory list order in which to search for those files ?
> > (i.e., first look at %DJDIR/lib and then if nothing is found at
> > %DJDIR/lib/gcc-lib/djgpp/2.81 ?
> > 
> 
> 
> You can check which one is being used in following way
> 
> gcc -v
> 
> Outputs actually used specs file
> 
> gcc -print-file-name=specs
> gcc -print-file-name=djgpp.djl
> 
> I think correct place for specs and djgpp.djl is 
> %DJDIR%/lib/gcc-lib/djgpp/(version)  as these files depends on gcc
> version.
> 
> Andris
> 
> 
Sorry for coming again on this subject, but if I have all undestand, then
the people who are using gcc-2.8.1 must move the files specs and djgpp.djl
which comes from DJGPP 2.02 from %DJDIR%/lib to
%DJDIR%/lib/gcc-lib/djgpp/gcc-2.8.1 .

And those which are still sticking to gcc-2.7.2.1 must leave specs and
djgpp.djl at their original place.

Am I right ?

If this is correct, then shouldn't it be precised in the readme.1st which
comes with DJGPP 2.02 ?

Olivier.