From: "D. Vrabel" <dv207 AT hermes DOT cam DOT ac DOT uk>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Some questions, and some bugs (perhaps)
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 1998 21:05:22 +0100
Organization: University of Cambridge, England
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <Pine.HPP.3.96L.981022210249.6848A-100000@tw200.eng.cam.ac.uk>
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 981022130542 DOT 3460A-100000 AT is> <gunaalubzrpbz DOT f18t5tb DOT pminews AT news DOT avnl1 DOT nj DOT home DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: tw200.eng.cam.ac.uk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Sender: dv207 AT tw200 DOT eng DOT cam DOT ac DOT uk
In-Reply-To: <gunaalubzrpbz.f18t5tb.pminews@news.avnl1.nj.home.com>
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, 22 Oct 1998, Mike Ruskai wrote:
> Something I forgot to mention is that the compiler had a problem with this
> statement:
> 
> enum BooleanConstants {false=0, true=1};
> 
> Any ideas why?  Works perfectly well with two other compilers.
false and true are keywords in C++ (I asume your talking about C++).  Use
the bool type for boolean variables.

Dave.