Message-Id: Comments: Authenticated sender is From: "Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET)" Organization: INTI To: Eli Zaretskii , djgpp AT delorie DOT com, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, Andris Pavenis , Robert Hoehne Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1998 09:25:01 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: Re: Is NT 100% broken or what? References: In-reply-to: X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v2.54) Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com Eli Zaretskii wrote: > On Mon, 5 Oct 1998, Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET) wrote: > > > I want to know if that's just my NT or is a problem in > > all the NTs. If the bug is in NT I'll simply drop the > > support for this platform because is 100% broken, but > > perhaps isn't NT. Any ideas? > > I tried this. It doesn't crash for me at all. It just clears the > screen. I tried to compile the program both as C and C++, with the same > effect. > > Maybe if you tell how did you compile it exactly, I could reproduce the > problem. I used GCC 2.7.2.1 and the command line didn't use any switches > beyond -Wall and -g. Nothing special, I generates the divide overflow compiling with and without optimization. And in my editor both calls are very separated. All seems to point to one thing: That's a "feature" of the spanish NT. Why I think that? talking with a friend he told me that M$ support in Argentina recommends the use of the english version!!! > > * Ctrl+C when a djgpp program is running some times > > generates an exception, in my NT says: > > > > "Error de aplicacion y se esta > > generando un registro de error de aplicacion. > > ntvdm.exe > > Excepcion: infraccion de acceso (0xC0000005), direccion > > 0xf003084" > > A known problem. I don't know why does it happen, but it doesn't > happen every time. Some programs almost never cause NT to puke, > others almost always do, still others sometimes do and sometimes > don't. > > For example, programs that call __dpmi_yield in its old incarnation (the > one that called INT 2Fh directly) crash badly, but those which were > linked with a new version of __dpmi_yield (that calls __dpmi_int) work > much better when Ctrl-C is pressed. > > > Perhaps that's when ^C hits NT and not the djgpp program. > > But I'm not sure. > > Does Ctrl-BREAK work reliably? If it does, then the problem is most > probably with the special ^C handling that NT does to emulate DOS. > Two things to try are: > > - Hook Int 23h in the startup code. dpmiexcp.c already does that > for some special brands of a PC: it sets Int 23h to a function > that does an IRET. Maybe NT needs that as well. > > - Remove the ^C character from the keyboard buffer in the DJGPP > keyboard handler. The change should be done in exceptn.S. > AFAIK, the special handling of Ctrl-C by DOS happens when it > sees 0x03 character in the keyboard buffer; the fact that this > problem happens only sometimes might hint that if the DJGPP > program is aborted by SIGINT *before* NT DOS emulator sees ^C, > all is well. In that case, removing ^C from the keyboard buffer > should solve the problem. > > Btw, I think we should always remove ^C from the keyboard > buffer. I never understood why we don't do that now. Ok, I'll see if I can try it. Greetings, SET ------------------------------------ 0 -------------------------------- Visit my home page: http://set-soft.home.ml.org/ or http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Vista/6552/ Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET). (Electronics Engineer) Alternative e-mail: set-soft AT usa DOT net set AT computer DOT org ICQ: 2951574 Address: Curapaligue 2124, Caseros, 3 de Febrero Buenos Aires, (1678), ARGENTINA TE: +(541) 759 0013