Sender: nate AT cartsys DOT com
Message-ID: <360C437C.838864@cartsys.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1998 18:29:32 -0700
From: Nate Eldredge <nate AT cartsys DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Renato F. Cantao" <cantao AT ime DOT unicamp DOT br>
CC: "Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET)" <salvador AT inti DOT gov DOT ar>, djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Memory allocation!
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 96 DOT 980925165045 DOT 24651A-100000 AT athenas DOT ime DOT unicamp DOT br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Renato F. Cantao wrote:

> OK, that's perfect. I'm meaning, does exist any other routine faster than
> new or malloc?

Besides the other things mentioned, the 2.02 alpha contains (in
fmalloc.c) a set of malloc routines that are very very fast, though
somewhat wasting of memory.  They had some bugs but I think they are
fixed in the latest alpha.  You probably would want to just take these
routines; the entire 2.02 libc is not yet considered stable enough for
general use.
-- 

Nate Eldredge
nate AT cartsys DOT com