From: fesenko AT pacific DOT net DOT sg (Victor)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Remaining memory under OS/2 question
Date: Sat, 05 Sep 1998 04:37:09 GMT
Organization: Subscriber of Pacific Internet, Singapore
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <35f0bff3.9073000@news.pacific.net.sg>
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 980831121628 DOT 22974W-100000 AT is> <35eb49be DOT 27826391 AT news> <35eb853a DOT 16135542 AT news DOT Austria DOT EU DOT net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: dyn106ppp23.pacific.net.sg
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 31 Aug 1998 12:23:55 GMT, sparhawk AT eunet DOT at (Gerhard Gruber)
wrote:

>And how would you know that the shifting remaining memory is due to your
>program and from others? In a multitasking environment you could get =
>different
>results each time you check how much memory is available so this is not a=
> good
>approach to check for memory leaks.
>--
>Bye,
>   Gerhard
>
The thing is that I'm running only my program at highest priority,
there are no other programs running under OS/2. So I assume under
these circumstances I can use remaining memory value to assess any
memory leaks. Please, correct me if I'm wrong.

Victor.