Message-Id: <m0ytDlm-000S45C@inti.gov.ar>
Comments: Authenticated sender is <salvador AT natacha DOT inti DOT gov DOT ar>
From: "Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET)" <salvador AT inti DOT gov DOT ar>
Organization: INTI
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>, Gerhard Gruber <sparhawk AT eunet DOT at>,
        djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 1998 13:12:43 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Subject: Re: bash eats cycles
References: <m0ytBQS-000S3nC AT inti DOT gov DOT ar>
In-reply-to: <Pine.SUN.3.91.980706174920.28126F-100000@is>
Precedence: bulk

Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> wrote:
 
> On Mon, 6 Jul 1998, Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET) wrote:
> 
> > Strange! the version that doesn't eat CPU is the one that doesn't 
> > call __dpmi_yield. And bash (that calls __dpmi_yield) eats the CPU. 
> 
> It could be due to the fact that __dpmi_yield issues INT 2Fh directly.  
> That is why I suggested to try the newer version which does that via a 
> DPMI call.

Ok, but what's so wrong with it? is the emulation in the NT's DPMI 
server too slow? Well ... is M$ soft we can spect logical things from 
it ;-)

SET
------------------------------------ 0 --------------------------------
Visit my home page: http://set-soft.home.ml.org/
or
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Vista/6552/
Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET). (Electronics Engineer)
Alternative e-mail: set-soft AT usa DOT net set AT computer DOT org
ICQ: 2951574
Address: Curapaligue 2124, Caseros, 3 de Febrero
Buenos Aires, (1678), ARGENTINA
TE: +(541) 759 0013