From: "Martin Ambuhl" <mambuhl AT tiac DOT net>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: C/C++ language definition
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 1998 13:54:15 -0400
Organization: Nocturnal Aviation
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <6nghcj$c9i@news-central.tiac.net>
References: <359A1FFC DOT 8F0EF726 AT sis DOT co DOT at> <359B0B09 DOT F899D475 AT cartsys DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: p30.tc3.newyo.ny.tiac.com
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk


Nate Eldredge wrote in message <359B0B09 DOT F899D475 AT cartsys DOT com>...
|Gerhard W. Gruber wrote:
|>
|> Where can I get the defintion for C/C++?
|
|That's the ANSI standard.  AFAIK you buy it from the ANSI people and
pay
|them a lot of money :)
=============
The draft standards for C and for C++ are available on the
web for private reference.
For C, a source is http://wwwold.dkuug.dk/JTC1/SC22/open/n2620
For C++, a source is http://www.setech.com/press/x3.html

It is important to realize that the C and C++ languages were
already distinct and are moving even further apart, so there is
no such thing as a "definition for C/C++".  Be sure to read the
restrictions on use associated with the above documents.

Martin Ambuhl (mambuhl AT tiac DOT net)
/* Newsgroup posts also e-mailed */