Message-Id: <m0ylxMA-000S48C@inti.gov.ar>
Comments: Authenticated sender is <salvador AT natacha DOT inti DOT gov DOT ar>
From: "Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET)" <salvador AT inti DOT gov DOT ar>
Organization: INTI
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 1998 12:13:48 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Subject: Re: 64k demo (slightly off-topic reply)
In-reply-to: <6lun9s$cie@dfw-ixnews10.ix.netcom.com>
Precedence: bulk

"Matthew Conte" <spam AT somebody DOT else> wrote:

> Elliott Oti wrote in message <358305BC DOT 61AB AT stud DOT warande DOT ruu DOT nl>...
> >* Take it easy on static arrays and static global variables and try and
> >allocate as much dynamically as you can.
> 
> Quick question: is access to a dynamically allocated array slower than a
> static global array, or are they the same?

Hi Somebody else:

  You got a lot of answers, they are right in the fact that memory is memory, 
but read the e-mail I wrote replying to Eli to see why static arrays sometimes 
are really faster.

SET
------------------------------------ 0 --------------------------------
Visit my home page: http://set-soft.home.ml.org/
or
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Vista/6552/
Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET). (Electronics Engineer)
Alternative e-mail: set-soft AT usa DOT net set AT computer DOT org
ICQ: 2951574
Address: Curapaligue 2124, Caseros, 3 de Febrero
Buenos Aires, (1678), ARGENTINA
TE: +(541) 759 0013