From: Ian Miller Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: C command line options Date: 05 Jun 1998 12:55:43 +0100 Organization: Defence Evaluation & Research Agency Message-ID: <87lnrcjc5c.fsf@hasn.dera.gov.uk> References: <6l7iaq$l8t$4 AT news DOT bctel DOT net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 146.80.115.106 Lines: 47 To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Precedence: bulk "Daniel Urquhart" writes: > [CUT] > >I don't know C++ very well but > >string comparison could be made with == operator... > > You are (allmost but) not right. If you did use a string objects, they > coulde be compared with th == operator. BUT I have yet to see manny people > using clases for stings and it is DEFINETLY NOT standard ! Sorry, but I can't resist quoting from a posting by Bjarne Stroustrup to comp.std.c++ from November 1997: ==== Friday, Nov 14, the ISO C++ standards committee unanimously approved a "final draft international standard" (FDIS) for C++. This means that all technical work on the C++ standard has been completed. The number of the C++ standard is ISO/IEC 14882. There is a final step in the ISO process where the standards bureaucraties ratify the decision of their technical experts. However, that is a formality where no serious controversy exists (and the C++ vote was unanimous!). Under ISO rules, it is now possible to refer to the C++ standard from other standards. Therefore, so can we. We now have ISO C++, ANSI C++, AFNOR C++, BIS C++, DIN C++, etc. - and they are all the same :-) A press release from the committee aimed primarily at non-programmers can be found among my homepages. Personally, I'm very pleased with the new standard. - Bjarne Bjarne Stroustrup, AT&T Labs, http://www.research.att.com/~bs ==== Class string is specified in that standard. See for yourself at http://www.cygnus.com/misc/wp/nov97/lib-strings.html In short, it DEFINITELY *IS* standard. Ian -- Ian Miller, Dorset, UK The views expressed above are entirely those of the writer and do not represent the views, policy, or understanding of any other person or official body.