Message-Id: <m0yhGAm-000S3xC@inti.gov.ar>
Comments: Authenticated sender is <salvador AT natacha DOT inti DOT gov DOT ar>
From: "Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET)" <salvador AT inti DOT gov DOT ar>
Organization: INTI
To: "Dr. Andr s S+lyom" <solyom AT eik DOT bme DOT hu>, djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 1998 13:17:05 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: Goodbye/Congratulations note
In-reply-to: <35756043.FE891BEE@eik.bme.hu>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

"Dr. András Sólyom" <solyom AT eik DOT bme DOT hu> wrote:

> Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET) wrote:
> > 
> > I don't want to start another holly war, but ....
> 
> ....
> 
> > 
> > I agree with it too, but there are some important things to point, the most sad
> > is that M$, Watcom and Intel compilers generates better Pentium code (and even
> > better 486 code) than gcc. (Look comparissons in Byte articles, download the
> > sources, compile it and make your own comparissons).
> 
> and how about comparing the memory that you can use in the programs that are
> compiled with those compilers? I routinly use > 100-200 Mbytes of data under
> DOS and Linux with DJGPP and 64 Mbytes of RAM. MS, Watcom etc. gives you max.
> 64 Mbytes virtual memory, while even under DOS with DJGPP and CWSDPMI I can
> use more.

I was talking about win32 compilers so you can use all the memory that Windows 
NT or 95 can give to a native task. 
Of course: if you run your program under Linux it will run much better than a 
Win32 version because you are using a superior OS.

SET
------------------------------------ 0 --------------------------------
Visit my home page: http://set-soft.home.ml.org/
or
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Vista/6552/
Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET). (Electronics Engineer)
Alternative e-mail: set-soft AT usa DOT net set AT computer DOT org
ICQ: 2951574
Address: Curapaligue 2124, Caseros, 3 de Febrero
Buenos Aires, (1678), ARGENTINA
TE: +(541) 759 0013