From: perfecto AT mail2 DOT nai DOT net (Perry DOT Fecteau AT Republican DOT COM) Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp Subject: Re: An OS.. Date: Thu, 07 May 1998 15:52:02 GMT Organization: Milhouse America Lines: 11 Message-ID: <355cd89b.46585696@news.nai.net> References: <6iqncs$1q3$1 AT alpha DOT sky DOT net> <6irsjt$11h$1 AT nnrp1 DOT dejanews DOT com> NNTP-Posting-Host: ct-hartford-us1319.javanet.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp Precedence: bulk On Thu, 07 May 1998 03:50:03 -0600, b52g AT usa DOT net wrote: >FreeDOS is not yet compatible enough for DJGPP programs. > will it ever be? -------------------- http://w3.nai.net/~perfecto ------------------------- Perry Fecteau's Blueprints to Success. -------------------- http://w3.nai.net/~perfecto ------------------------- ast tuesday; I saw the program still active on monday. However, in the results-output-file it mentions that the program was finished already on the thursday morning, several days earlier!! The date of this file is identical (!!) to the date mentioned in the file. So I suspect that one way or another the internal clock is affected by the program, but as it seems not systematically. MSDOS must use the same clock for the date of the file. The way I get the time and date is the following set of ANSI code: int main() { ... time_t timer; struct tm *tblock; out= fopen(outfile,"w"); .... close(out); for (..../*situations*/) { timer = time(NULL); tblock = localtime(&timer); printf("%s",asctime(tblock)); /* perform nsim simulations */ for (sim=0, init=1, nsing=0; sim