Message-Id: <m0yG5K5-000S2vC@inti.gov.ar>
Comments: Authenticated sender is <salvador AT natacha DOT inti DOT gov DOT ar>
From: "Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET)" <salvador AT inti DOT gov DOT ar>
Organization: INTI
To: Sebastien BROCHET <tenabis AT geocities DOT com>, djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 1998 14:13:45 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Subject: Re: Limititation with DJGPP, scope problem ...
In-reply-to: <3512731B.EA2518A1@geocities.com>
Precedence: bulk

Sebastien BROCHET <tenabis AT geocities DOT com> wrote:

> I think I've come into a limitation in the use of DJGPP.
> Although this limitation can be avoided , hopefully !, it is still a bit
> annoying.
> 
[sniped example]
> 
> This snippet compiles well with BC3.0/3.1 and watcom 10.x
> I think the code above compiles well with DJGPP too but in my project
> there are a few more classes with some dependencies ...
> And DJGPP complains something like that :
> "Lookup in the scope 'class A' does not match lookup in the current
> scope"
> in the line (*) : m_pA->Set(Value); // method B::Raise
> 
> I can work around by writing :
> int i = Value;
> m_pA->Set(i);
> 
> and it compiles well.

I never experimented it. Can you post a piece of code where the problem *can* 
be reproduced. Because your example is OK and compiled OK. So perhaps your code 
isn't OK and that's why it doesn't compile OK ;-) (silly explanation, sorry).

It can be some bug in gcc or some typo.

SET
------------------------------------ 0 --------------------------------
Visit my home page: http://set-soft.home.ml.org/
or
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Vista/6552/
Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET). (Electronics Engineer)
Alternative e-mail: set-soft AT usa DOT net set AT computer DOT org
CQ: 2951574
Address: Curapaligue 2124, Caseros, 3 de Febrero
Buenos Aires, (1678), ARGENTINA
TE: +(541) 759 0013