From: "Andrew Crabtree" <andrewc AT rosemail DOT rose DOT hp DOT com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: DLL's in DJGPP
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 1998 14:02:05 -0800
Organization: Hewlett Packard
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <6e9m10$e5m$1@rosenews.rose.hp.com>
References: <6e9a9h$bs5$1 AT newsflash DOT concordia DOT ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ros51675cra.rose.hp.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk


MOHAMAD TOUFIC ALAME wrote in message
<6e9a9h$bs5$1 AT newsflash DOT concordia DOT ca>...
>The debate for
>having dll's isn't really important cause I think DJGPP should move to ELF
>sometime soon.
Do you have any idea what you are talking about?  Do you think moving to elf
is going to magically make shared libraries work?  I think not.  There are
systems out there that use a.out and manage to do shared libraries.
Granted, elf is a more advanced file format than coff, but it doesn't really
buy DJGPP anything
without a corresponding advanced OS.