From: "Mr. X" <fake AT spam DOT free DOT net>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Size of executables...
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 1998 14:10:13 -0800
Organization: Skylink Networks, Inc. (http://www.skylink.net./)
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <6dcm4p$jrl$1@news.skylink.net>
References: <6d9c67$3or3 AT beaker DOT nit DOT gwu DOT edu> <6db63f$9vn$1 AT news DOT skylink DOT net> <34F96E08 DOT 30BA57A5 AT cornell DOT edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp215.max3.las-vegas.nv.skylink.net
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

A. Sinan Unur wrote
>this is the biggest load of bull i have seen in quite a while. the
>reasons why djgpp programs produce somewhat larger executables are
>specified in the faq and in a gazillion previous threads which you can
>search and read to your heart's content at http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/
>
>linking is done on a module-by-module basis, so it is entirely up to you
>to determine how finely grained it will be.


   Of course you are right.  It is obviously by module and not my library.
I'm sorry for anybody mislead by my post!


>but then, why would anyone think a Mr. X from Las Vegas would post
>correct information?
>--
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>A. Sinan Unur
>Department of Policy Analysis and Management, College of Human Ecology,
>Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA

   Hmmm, nevermind....

X