From: "John M. Aldrich" <fighteer AT cs DOT com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: djgpp 2.1?
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 1998 20:50:22 -0500
Organization: Two pounds of chaos and a pinch of salt.
Lines: 22
Message-ID: <34EB8FDE.59E8@cs.com>
References: <6cdhr4$ae6 AT dfw-ixnews3 DOT ix DOT netcom DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp227.cs.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

matthew p. conte wrote:
> 
> forgive my ignorance, but i read on Brennan's DJGPP resources page that the
> latest version of djgpp is 2.1.  why can't i find anything but my trusty ol'
> version i like to call 2.01?  i'm hoping it's just a typo and a newer
> version isn't being held hostage from me.

In the current DJGPP version (2.01), the DJGPP macro is set to 2 and
DJGPP_MINOR is set to 1.  It seems to me that this could lead to serious
ambiguities should v2.x ever creep above .09.  However, at least at
present, when you see someone referring to 2.1, they mean 2.01.

Oh, and disguising your email address when asking for information is
very impolite.

-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|      John M. Aldrich       | "Be wary of strong drink.  It can    |
|       aka Fighteer I       | make you shoot at tax collectors--   |
|   mailto:fighteer AT cs DOT com   | and miss."                           |
| http://www.cs.com/fighteer |                 - Lazarus Long       |
---------------------------------------------------------------------