From: Ivan Nincic <inincic AT unixg DOT ubc DOT ca>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: VESA LFB (memory handling)
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 1998 05:39:22 -0800
Organization: The University of British Columbia
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <34E6F00A.25C5@unixg.ubc.ca>
Reply-To: inincic AT unixg DOT ubc DOT ca
NNTP-Posting-Host: p034.netinfo1.net.ubc.ca
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

Hi 

I am experimenting with various rasterizing algorithms and up to now I
was using banked modes under VESA (DOS). Now  when I wanted to implement
symmetric line algorithms, bank switching slows down algorithm,
incredibly. Linear frame buffer should solve the problem, but it seems
that it requires lots of messing with DOS internals (real, protected
mode) and I really  do not want to that. 

My question is LFB programming under Linux more enjoyable ( less messy)? 
Moreover, does memory handling under Linux using GNU C++ suffers form
any of GNU C++/DOS illnesses such as: weird memory-handling functions or
libraries, various memory organisations, DPMI, etc. ?

Thank you

Ivan

You can  reply me on my email: inincic AT unixg DOT ubc DOT ca

------------------------------------------------------
Ivan Nincic
email: inincic AT unixg DOT ubc DOT ca
Vancouver, BC