From: Ian Chapman <ichapman AT nortel DOT ca>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: When will DJGPP support standard C++?
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 1998 12:12:54 -0500
Organization: Nortel
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <34D5FE96.1B1@nortel.ca>
References: <6b0qu2$2o7$1 AT winter DOT news DOT erols DOT com> <34D3F542 DOT 5787 AT cs DOT com> <6b2csu$1js_002 AT news DOT glasscity DOT net>
Reply-To: ichapman AT nortel DOT ca
NNTP-Posting-Host: bcarib90.bnr.ca
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Precedence: bulk

I'm not complaining however I'd like to point out that once the port to
the latest draft standard is made we may have to use the draft standard
itself ( http://www.csci.csusb.edu/dick/c%2b%2bstd/cd2/ )to figure out
how to use it.  There I'm sure will be a delay between the port and a
tutorial on what it does and that book will have a good price.

	Just last night I started to use complex class.  It was well documented
in C++ lib info, only problem djgpp v2 did not Know about it.  I went to
info faq and did a search on complex and wow situation resolved.  Q
complex worked on v1 not v2 !! ... similar to my problem v2 uses
containers or templates or whatever it's not in my c++ tutorial.

	I suspect that c++ is evolving faster than the developers also it's
being pushed by various marketers.  It's a good idea to keep up but
backwards compatibility should be considered.  Hunting round all the
complex.h files Oh well why be nonstandard with if this then that too
complicated.

		Regards Ian