Date: Fri, 30 Jan 1998 22:40:44 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199801310640.WAA09939@adit.ap.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Thomas Demmer , djgpp AT delorie DOT com From: Nate Eldredge Subject: Re: x/0, and a problem with realloc Cc: viking AT caverock DOT net DOT nz Precedence: bulk At 12:12 1/30/1998 +0100, Thomas Demmer wrote: >> One question, to A. Sinan Unur, what are Extended reals? You mentioned them in >> reference to dividing by zero in an article (29-Jan-1998). >a real is usually 4 byte long, a double 8 byte, and an extended real 10 >bytes. >They differ in signficant digits and maximum/minimum exponent. >An extended real is the "native" data representation for the x87. I think two different things called "extended real" are being talked about here. One seems to be a conceptual point of numerical analysis, and the other is an FPU implementation issue. Seems to me the one we're interested in here is the one that's "the set of real numbers plus positive and negative infinity". To me at least, it's not clear how one would actually get this to work. Nate Eldredge eldredge AT ap DOT net